EPS growth field. I suggest changing from the "NM" value, when crossing zero, to "Turnaround/Worsening"
Hi SA Team,
In the Peers screen, seeing the "NM" value in the "EPS Diluted 3 Year (CAGR)" field value can be somewhat misleading. For example, OIBR, a company that is going through a turnaround by selling unprofitable divisions will naturally show negative revenue CAGR that couple with that "NM" in EPS 3Y CAGR, as it changes from negative to positive, misses the most important point. It can also work the other way around so I suggest changing the "NM" value, when crossing zero, to something like "Turnaround" when is upwards or "Worsening" when is downwards.
Thanks for the feedback, I'll relay the same to our product team.
Data QA Analyst, Seeking Alpha