Article limit
It’s a shame you guys no longer offer free articles. The limit is not nearly high enough. For those not-as-serious investors who just enjoy reading—you lost me as a user unfortunately 😞
It’s a shame you guys no longer offer free articles. The limit is not nearly high enough. For those not-as-serious investors who just enjoy reading—you lost me as a user unfortunately 😞
wow, get a life.
SA admins—Idiots like this might be out there validating your decision, but I respectfully think it was the wrong decision. Good luck with your business I hope there’s enough guys like this weirdo to keep you guys running
wow, get a life.
SA admins—Idiots like this might be out there validating your decision, but I respectfully think it was the wrong decision. Good luck with your business I hope there’s enough guys like this weirdo to keep you guys running
But of course you think it was the wrong decision. You want the content for free.
It appears as though a substantial subset of us non-Premium subscribers were targeted by an up-or-out policy. There are a bunch of other threads like this one. The busiest one is here.
There are still many non-Premium subscribers being served by the other policy that was established a couple of years ago. I infer that SA is conducting an experiment to assess its effects with an eye toward extending it to all non-Premium subscribers.
There are alternatives, of course. Yahoo Finance and Substack are both worth considering, IMO.
You can read articles and comments in a web browser by disabling cookies for seekingalpha.com, though you can't post or identify unread comments. This loophole may not be hard to close, so I would be surprised to see it persist.
I’m really happy SA moved to a paid model. I know a lot of people are telling SA that they lost a reader. All they lost are those who don’t want to pay. No big loss at all.