Improving the quality of submitted analysis
I believe your site would benefit greatly from some sort of peer, or qualified team, review of submitted analysis before they “go live”. There are quality write-ups, but also too many weak and uninformed submissions. It compromises the quality of your company and diminishes other quality information. I have several ideas, and am happy to share if interested, as I’m sure many others do. Regards, Barry H Colvin
I agree. I think at the very least allowing the community to down vote and avoid click bait would be appreciated. There is a lot of nonsense articles supported by nothing of substance.