Ok - that Sector Avg and 5Y Avg would certainly be a helpful improvement and that is pretty much what I meant. I still think it would be nice to see this average incorporated into the charts to the extent possible. You could still glean more information from the chart. For example, you could see that for a period of 15 months 3 years ago the PE ratio was below the 5 year average (among other insights). You wouldn't know that from just seeing the numbers.

Thank you for the help and for listening.

No, average for the specific stock that you are looking at. I see you have the TTM PE for stocks in the chart at the top of the Value tab. I just think it would be nice to be able to expand the time horizon and also show it on the charts at the bottom of the Value tab so you can more easily see the current PE Ratio in relation to the historical average given the time frame selected.

Sector average would be OK as well but I typically don't look at sector information because I think it is too broad.

Same here. I requested a prorated refund of my annual subscription after just 2 months of using it. The utility of the service I subscribed to was greatly reduced after they hid old articles behind a paywall. To SA's credit, they gave me the refund without any hassle. I guess that means they aren't going to give in on this new pricing structure.

I currently subscribe to a Marketplace service that costs $1,000 per year and provides quantitative analysis on virtually every stock worldwide. It is a great tool to find stocks that meet their criteria using a wide range of formulas, calculations, etc. However, it doesn't provide a deep dive on what each of the companies does, and realistically, how could they provide that on every stock. So it is up to me to do that after narrowing down the field.

I had been using this tool to find companies, many obscure and not widely known or covered, then reading about previous analysis done on them on SA. Since many of these are not widely covered, I will never find the article within the first 10 days. Now I no longer have access to these old articles. While the old articles may have provided outdated financial analysis, they often explained what the company did better than what you can gather from the companies own websites, who the competitors are, general information about the industry they are in, etc.

I can't justify paying another $900 per year for access to these old articles on top of what I'm already paying for the Marketplace service. I can say with certainty that at this point I will not be renewing my service next year unless something changes with the pricing structure. 

Why not have a much reduced price for those that subscribe to a Marketplace service (maybe $10/month)? This gives a benefit to those that have supported the authors previously and now and would probably incentivize some to sign up for a Marketplace service to get the reduced rate.

I regret even signing up for the service at this point. I wouldn't have done so had I known that a valuable tool that I saw as a necessary complimentary piece would be hidden behind a paywall just a couple months later. I feel duped and am upset at the utter lack of communication surrounding this whole thing.