Your comments
Without Bias? "Energy Transfer self reports spill" discussing less than one gallon of drilling mud, Carl Surran changed title to changed to "Pipeline Operator Reports Yet More Leaks", "Hai Phong Announces Exxon LNG Plant" changed to "Vietnamese city said to approve LNG project". Is it SeekingAlpha policy to alter titles from AP/Reuters/Press Releases to paint them in the most negative possible light or is that something only Carl Surran is allowed to do?
If there is no bias why are news articles being titled so misleadingly? Why is "good news" (finds, discoveries, contracts) showing up 4 days after every other outlet yet "bad news" (spills, terminations, renegotiations) shows up almost immediately, and it all happens in the same political direction?
Discover a super massive field (Exxon Guyana anyone?) not a damn peep for weeks. Was Carl on vacation or deliberately ignoring it? Did he know and refused to do his job and break the news here, or is he so incompetant as an energy editor that the largest energy discovery of the last 25+ years just slipped by unnoticed? Yet when BP makes some insincere gesgure and vague promises twards doing *something* green *sometime* in the future? FRONT PAGE ENERGY NEWS WITHIN THE HOUR!
Its become clear that your energy team cares more about politics than energy and the quality of your site has suffered as such. Why is Carl Surran allowed to continue a deliberate left-green spin operation with impunity under the guise of "editorial control"?
Seeking Alpha repeatedly deletes my posts particularly pro-Trump or are tough on Seeking Alpha editors taking political stances.
When did this financial forum become partisan?
Customer support service by UserEcho
Oh really? Carl Surran lieing about pipeline companies again? Color me shocked!
But seriously, Carl Surran is a propagandist.
Just do a search for "Carl Surran" in the feedback forum to find numerous other instances of people taking this "editor" to task for deliberately misrepresenting the energy sector!