One other suggestion, why not make information such as earnings reports and upcoming dividends on the person's Portfolio  available at no cost.  You are paying no one to provide this basic information.  

You are not WSJ, Bloomberg or the New York Times.  They are far larger and are provide the news.  They also have staff writers on their payroll.  You are not comparing apples and apples.  With as many comments as you have received that are negative and people are removing their Seeking Alpha apps and want to delete their accounts, I would think you could come up with a happy medium that would be more palatable to your long time readers such as myself.  I have been using Seeking Alpha since 2012.  You have been given some very good ideas on how to generate more income without charging us $20-$30 per month.  I have a subscription to the Washington Post for $4 per month!  I subscribe to the Los Angeles Times for less per year than you are charging.  You are way out of line and appear to be greedy, not a good impression.  In the middle of a pandemic where people want to keep what they have, this is not the time to start charging egregious amounts of money.  One more time, I implore you to rethink how to generate more income without charging $20-$30 per month.  Take a look at your readers suggestions seriously.  Thank you.

Could you please suggest the free platforms with better articles.  I would appreciate the help.

I've been getting articles on my portfolio for years and now you want to limit what I get to try to get me to sign up for Premium.  I don't need Premium.  I just need the articles.  I am deeply disappointed in your decision to limit users of your website and will source out another company if you don't decide to change this policy.  It is greedy and makes your company look really bad.