Can you please share where you're posting, so that we can address this issue? IE articles, news, stocktalks?

Per our moderation team, you have violated our community guidelines and therefore are in moderation. You should have received full information from them on this. 

Hi, As a crowdsourced website, we seek to provide a complete perspective on investment ideas, so that readers can benefit from seeing the bullish and bearish viewpoints and make their own independent decisions.

Thanks,
GBM

Mistapproach: Thank you for the note. Please know, he was not censored, and he is welcome to resume publishing with us. We remain in touch with him, and hope to resolve the situation amicably. 

Thanks,
GBM

Hi Ferrell, Because taxes are so tricky, and vary, the best advice on that is often to consult with your tax advisor. That said, you make a fair point that this is a hole in the discussion, and we will try to find ways to do this effectively. 

Thanks,

GBM

First, thank you for the feedback, it's helpful for the editors, and we will share it with the writer. Keep in mind, any time there is an author you don't want to see, you can mute them. 

Thanks,

GBM

Apologies, can you email the ID, if this is still a problem, to me at george@seekingalpha.com?

Thank you for your feedback. I'd like to share two important facts about your comment. First, our editors don't remove comments. There is a separate team that handles community moderation. Second, our editors curate news flow and post items that are relevant to shareholders in a company, without bias.

Can you let me know the status of the article now? We don't see any draft or pending articles from you currently.

I'm going to answer this question by sharing several, but not all, of the processes we follow to ensure the integrity of our platform. 

Among the layers of security employed: we obtain and independently validate personal information on all contributors; we require disclosure of third-party affiliations; we review sources of stock promotion information routinely; we investigate every dispute we receive, particularly when there are allegations of improper behavior. 

Our confidence in this process stems from the fact that people seeking to skirt the rules would have to lie under their own names, and they have to have confidence that our independent verifications won't unearth their behavior. Further, as some people do test the process, we have a one-strike you're out rule for violations of disclosure rules. 

I hope you understand I was not specific because I don't want to provide a ne'er-do-well with a roadmap to get around our processes. 

Thanks for the question.

GBM