If you believe there is a material error in an article, please follow our disputes process, outlined here, to report it.
To follow up here, Money Metals Exchange reposts some authors' work from their own website, and there is no issue with that. However, we will start adding bylines to their pieces for clarity purposes.
Thank you again for bringing this to our attention.
Thanks Don, we appreciate you sharing the link. We're looking into this.
Can you please share links to the articles, so we can investigate?
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The suspect followers have been removed.
SA Moderation team
It appears that you hadn't activated your account, so none of your comments reached us.
We've now activated it for you, so we will be able to review your comments going forward.
The comments in question all seem to be replies related to OESX.
Please check your comment list, going through using 'filter by ticker' on the left-hand side to see them in context, and click 'report abuse' under any comments that you didn't write.
Nothing has been submitted to us. Check your Drafts to make sure that you completed the process fully.
The first link there, which mentions 17-20 shares was written in December 2016, before Frontier executed a 15-for-1 reverse split in July 2017. Does that explain the number disparity?
That link isn't to a Seeking Alpha article. Can you point us to which article on our site you said was incorrect?
Customer support service by UserEcho