That's what sponsors are for. DO NOT defend or justify something that is neither!!!! I've seen your response on every post about this. YOU ARE WRONG !!! "." END OF STORY
If your employer asked you to work for free and when you said you couldn't, they told you to get a sponsor so that you could in fact work for free, would you do it?
I do not work for them. Just calling it like it is.
If your employer asked you to work for free and when you said you couldn't, they told you to get a sponsor so that you could in fact work for free, would you do it?
They already take a cut from the articles the authors put behind a paywall, so they are not working for free and never have.
SA would not have existed so long if they didn’t make enough money to cover their cost.
They already take a cut from the articles the authors put behind a paywall, so they are not working for free and never have.
SA would not have existed so long if they didn’t make enough money to cover their cost.
Fair enough. In that case they have decided they want a raise. Which is more than okay. More than.
If your employer asked you to work for free and when you said you couldn't, they told you to get a sponsor so that you could in fact work for free, would you do it?
Don't even think of making that comparison. It doesn't hold a drop of water. Your trolling response to this issue sucks.
No; You're not
Fair enough. In that case they have decided they want a raise. Which is more than okay. More than.
NOT HERE & IN THIS CASE> When the f&*k are you gonna get it?
I see nothing wrong with SA wanting to be paid for their efforts.