Censorship
I read SA daily - I have it up most of the day, in the background, in fact.
It's deeply disappointing to me that something like PhilStockWorld's daily blog (and whatever else is going unposted by SA's editors) would be censored here, not for profanity nor vulgarity, but for content that apparently doesn't sit right with some readers /editors. PSW's blog is one of the central reasons I come to SA each day (and 50k others, it would appear) as an amateur study of options and the interplay of geopolitical goings-on with the macro- economy.
My Question:
What is the policy on political speech within investment / market observations for SA contributors? Are we pretending that a hypothetical federal government's behavior - ludicrous or otherwise - doesn't have a relevant bearing on the market?
It seems that you censor anyone who challenges the "resist movement"! I have attempted to highlight the fact that a certain user's message history is entirely filled with anti Trump statements - every message contains an anti Trump theme. I don't want this kind of low brow political discussion. But instead of seeing the real problem, you have excluded my posts. This is bizarre behavior on your part, since you appear to allow childish name calling.
I'm currently in the sin bin for being a pro-Trump policy advocate.
For the past MONTH all of my messages get on the "wait on our moderation" . 90% of my posts never get posted.
SA discriminates against the anti resist movement. That is a fact.
I see vile anti-Trump administration posts all day long. None of it relates to the article in any way, shape or form. None of it ever gets censored.